HiNTS exam

What

Series of three quick, bedside, physical exam maneuvers that can potentially rule out a central cause of vertigo

 

Hi for head impulse testing, or head thrust testing.
N for nystagmus to remind you to look for direction-changing or vertical nystagmus
TS for test of skew.

 

HINTS1.png




 

Why

  • Nearly two-thirds of patients with stroke lack focal neurologic signs that would be readily apparent to a nonneurologist

  • Presence of all three “reassuring” exam findings suggests it can be ruled out with a 100% sensitivity for ischemic stroke in AVS while an initial MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) had a 88% sensitivity





 

Who

Maneuvers used to help distinguish between central and peripheral vertigo in patients experiencing an acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) which is best defined as: rapid-onset vertigo, nausea and/or vomiting, gait unsteadiness, head motion intolerance, and nystagmus.

 

When

The patient must be experiencing continuous vertigo for the results to be reliably interpreted.

How

Head Impulse Test

HINTS2.png







  • Ask the patient to relax his/her head and maintain his/her gaze on your nose. Gently move the patient’s head to one side, then rapidly move it back to the neutral position. The patient may have a small corrective saccade. The head impulse test is positive (consistent with peripheral vertigo) if there is a significant lag with corrective saccades. If you can see the correction, it is abnormal. Compare this to the contralateral side; a difference in the speed of correction should be noted.

  • In acute vestibular syndrome, an abnormal result of a head impulse test usually indicates a peripheral vestibular lesion, whereas a normal response virtually confirms a stroke.

  • Abnormal exam rules in peripheral vertigo and thus rules out central vertigo if only unilateral

  • Video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpghlvnrREI&feature=youtu.be&t=665

 

Nystamus

  • Note if it is present in primary gaze (i.e. looking straight ahead) and or in lateral gaze. Unidirectional, horizontal nystagmus is reassuring for peripheral vertigo where as purely bidirectional, vertical or torsional can be consistent with central cause

  • The most common peripheral nystagmus, BPPV, in the posterior semicircular canal consists of a unidirectional horizontal nystagmus with a torsional component.

 

Test of Skew

  • Have the patient maintain his/her gaze on your nose. Alternate covering each of the patient’s eyes

  • Positive result will be the deviation of one eye while it is being covered, followed by correction after uncovering it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAPaIMMsV_A

 

Summary

  • If the HiNTs exam is entirely consistent with peripheral vertigo (positive head impulse test, unidirectional and horizontal nystagmus, negative test of skew), then, according to the derivation paper, it is 100% sensitive and 96% specific for a peripheral cause of vertigo.

  • Use of HiNTs exam in the ED is currently controversial as the primary study was performed by neurologists in a partially differentiated patient population

  • likely has higher utility in the patient population in whom the clinician suspects a peripheral cause of their vertigo to rule out central cause and limit needless imaging

 

 

Limitations

  • Do not perform on any patient that has head trauma, neck trauma, an unstable spine, or neck pain concerning for arterial dissection.

  • Do not perform in patients with known severe carotid stenosis as it may embolize unstable plaque

  • Challenging to differentiate between catch up saccade and nystagmus

  • Patients with acute active AVS likely to not tolerate the testing

  • Patient must be awake and cooperative.

  • Essentially an awake “doll’s eye” that requires conscious fixation on an object. Cannot perform on mentally impaired or sedated patients

  • Not yet been validated by a large external group, let alone a large external group of emergency medicine providers.

  • In the study, exam performed by ophtho neurologists

 

References

 

NUEMBlog

Tamingthesru

Nelson, James A., and Erik Viirre. "The clinical differentiation of cerebellar infarction from common vertigo syndromes." Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 10.4 (2009): 273.

Kattah, Jorge C., et al. "HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging." Stroke 40.11 (2009): 3504-3510.

Tarnutzer, Alexander A., et al. "Does my dizzy patient have a stroke? A systematic review of bedside diagnosis in acute vestibular syndrome." CmAJ 183.9 (2011): E571-E592.




 · 

POTD: Tongue Blade Test in Minor Mandibular Blunt Trauma

Minor trauma with mild swelling and want to avoid imaging the patient?

Tongue blade test:

How is it done? Have the patient attempt to "clamp down on” a tongue blade between the teeth with enough force that the examiner is unable to pull it out from the teeth.

When the examiner twists the blade, a patient should be able to generate enough force to break or crack the blade.

A positive test: if the patient cannot clench the tongue blade between the teeth or if the examiner cannot break the blade while it is held in the patient’s bite. If the test is positive, imaging is indicated.  

A negative test: If the blade can be gripped by the patient and be broken by the examiner, fracture of the mandible is much less likely, and additional imaging is likely not needed. In a prospective series of 110 patients with suspected mandible fracture, the test was found to be approximately 96% sensitive and 65% specific.

Who is not likely to benefit from this test? Major trauma that would indicate further imaging, signs of mandibular fracture such as: intraoral bleeding, tooth malocclusion, trismus, ecchymosis, and intraoral swelling.

Sources: https://www.aliem.com/2010/07/trick-of-trade-tongue-blade-is-as/

^ Check out this awesome aliem post and especially for the video demonstration

Alonso L, Purcell T. Accuracy of the tongue blade test in patients with suspected mandibular fracture. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(3):297-304. [PubMed]

Peer IX

 · 

POTD: Ludwig’s Angina

History: Named after German physician, Wilhelm Frederick von Ludwig, who first described this condition in 1836.

Overview:

•        Submandibular Space Cellulitis

•        Bilateral

•        Aggressive, fast spreading

•        70% of Ludwig’s angina is dental in origin

•        Real risk of airway compromise: This can result in rapid airway decompensation.


Physical Exam (useful things to document the presence of absence of in the chart):

•        Floor of the mouth: is described as: “woody,” which means firm, indurated, taut

•        Tongue: displaced superiorly and posteriorly

•        This result in: Slow suffocation, drooling, sniffing position, muffled voice, stridor

•        Labs

•        Vbg, cbc 7, blood cultures

•        Imaging

•        CT face and neck with IV contrast

•        Be very cautious if you are sending them to CT without airway secured

•        Consults

•        ENT, anesthesia

 

Treatment

•        ABCs…A! Airway obstruction in 33%

•        sit upright

•        Secure/verify integrity of airway

•        Awake fiberoptic nasal intubation

•        Mentally prepare yourself for a surgical airway. This is the time to have the materials set up at the bedside.

•        Abx: polymicrobial

  • Oral anaerobes and aerobes

  • PCN G + flagyl

  • Unasyn

  • Clinda

  • Immunocompromised? Cefepime +flagyl

•        Steroids

  • Dexamethasone  8-12 mg IV

•        Dispo

  • ICU

  • 3-4 day process, gets worse before better


Complications

•        Mortality usually associated with airway compromise

•        with appropriate treatment, 8% mortality

•        Spread of infection: IJ thrombophlebitis, intracranial infection, mediastinitis

 

Brush up!

Brush up!

Sources: LIFL https://lifeinthefastlane.com/ccc/ludwigs-angina/

Uptodate Lugwig’s angina

Tintinelli’s Lugwig’s angina

 ·