POTD: Bringing a needle to a knife fight

Hello friends,

For my final clinical content based POTD, I wanted to summarize the steps for a nightmare event: the pediatric can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate scenario.

Resus residents, do you ever find yourself just glossing over the small bag in the corner of the bottom drawer of the airway cart when you do your daily check? The one labeled with the piece of tape that says “jet insufflation”? Maybe in the back of your head you have a vague idea that it’s supposed to be used for a needle cric in pediatric patients below 8 years old. But that’ll probably never happen right? Well, I’m here to tell you…..you probably are right. But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be prepared for it.

I remember early resus year when I would check that the things on the check list were in that bag, but not actually have the context for how it all pieced together. It wasn't until PGY-2 procedure day when me and my co-residents in our group realized what a blind spot it had been for us. What are these random small syringes with the top off? Why is there the top of an ETT just out and about in here? Well, after reviewing the steps for the procedure, hopefully you can visualize how it all comes together.

Steps

1.     Prep and drape while locating the cricothyroid membrane.

2.     Pierce the membrane with the 14G angiocath directed 30-45 degree caudally.

3.     Advance catheter over needle, hub to skin, and remove needle.

4.     Attach a 7-0 ETT adaptor to top of a 3mL syringe with plunger taken out and attach this apparatus to the catheter.

5.     Attach a BVM to ETT adaptor.

6.     Take a deep breath (but don’t forget to also give your patient one), you did it.

It’s a relatively simple procedure, just with insanely high stakes.

Because I’m very much a visual learner:

Here’s a quick 1:52 min video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_PV7N2c2pQ. Note how the video does it is probably slightly different than how we would with our own makeshift kit here. Sorry for the potato quality but it’s short and gets the point across.

And lastly, I wanted to summarize a recent article written in June (the First10EM link below) that actually advocates doing a surgical approach with a scalpel and not going down the needle cric route for kids like what is traditionally taught to us. The author was also featured on this week’s episode of EMRAP going over this topic. Basically multiple professional societies have come out with contradictory guidelines over the use of needle vs surgical cric, which is not helpful. Data is super limited because of the rarity of this event in this population. Pediatric case reports seem to demonstrate a lack of success of the needle approach as the first line and that complications are to be expected even when the airway is established. This is seen again and again in adult studies as well.

The author then advocates that having the peds surgical cric approach in your toolbox is the best guarantee of achieving a definitive airway in this scenario with the least complications.

In children less than eight years old, the cricoid membrane may be too small so the horizontal incision step is discarded. There is also a higher risk of transecting the entire trachea with the horizontal incision. Instead in the peds surgical approach, you would just do a vertical cut through the trachea (though no more than 2 tracheal rings as this can make repair afterwards more difficult).

Would love to know what other peds providers think about this stance. It does seem like it is branching a little bit farther than what we’re comfortable with, but this is where the art of medicine comes in because the paucity of data out there.

References

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537350/

https://first10em.com/the-pediatric-cant-intubate-cant-oxygenate-scenario-use-a-knife/

https://www.tamingthesru.com/blog/acmc/needle-cricothyrotomy

Breathe easy friends!

 · 

VOTW: Pediatric Skull Fracture

This week’s VOTW is brought to you by the UST~

A 9 month old female infant was brought into the Pediatric ED two days after a fall from a high chair. The infant vomited once after the fall but was otherwise acting normally since then. The patient was brought to the ED 48hrs after the fall for a boggy left parietal scalp hematoma. The patient had a normal physical exam apart from the hematoma.  A POCUS was performed which showed...

Clip 1 shows an oblique disruption in the cortex of the skull, indicative of a fracture. The bones have an “overlapping” appearance. A hypoechoic hematoma is present overlying the fracture.

Image 1 shows the same fracture with relevant structures labeled.

Image 2 shows a cortical disruption in the skull of the same patient, but this one is a cranial suture

Sutures and fractures look the same! How do I differentiate them?

  • A suture can be followed all the way to a fontanelle.

  • Sutures are present symmetrically - scan the contralateral side if unsure

  • Fractures may appear irregular, jagged or displaced.

  • Sutures generally have an “end-to-end appearance” (image 2)- the cortex stops, there is a small space, and then restarts.

  • A fracture is likely to have an overlying hematoma.

Image 3. More examples of sutures

Image 4. A review of the anatomy of sutures and fontanelles

How to perform the study

  1. have a parent or assistant stabilize the child’s head, especially if they are squirmy

  2. use a linear high frequency probe and a lot of gel, especially if there is hair

  3. warm up the gel (put the gel bottle in your backpocket) which might make it less uncomfortable for the patient

  4. scan the area of swelling in two orthogonal planes and look for disruptions in the cortex

  5. scan the area around the hematoma as well- the fracture may not be directly under the hematoma

Clinical Decision Making

There is limited data on the use of POCUS for diagnosing pediatric skull fractures.

  •  When performed by EM Physicians, POCUS for skull fractures has sensitivities ranging from 67% - 100% and specificity of 85% - 100% (1)

  •  The presence of a skull fracture increases the likelihood of intracranial injury by four-fold (2)

POCUS for pediatric skull fractures might be most useful in the borderline case- for example a child who has an occipital/parietal/temporal scalp hematoma but otherwise looks great in the ED. Using PECARN you decide that you would rather observe this patient than subjecting the patient to radiation +/- sedation. If you decide to perform a POCUS, the absence of a skull fracture might be reassuring to you (and the family) and support your shared decision to observe the patient. The presence of a skull fracture might raise your concern for intracranial injury and change your decision about imaging. 

For a patient with a high pre-test probabiltiy for underlying pathology a negative POCUS should not be used a rule out test.

It might also be useful seeing a depressed or complex skull fracture as this may expedite imaging and specialist consultation.

More research is needed to define the role of POCUS in clinical decision making and how we might be able to integrate it with clinical decision rules like PECARN.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Your Sono Team

  1. Alexandridis G, Verschuuren EW, Rosendaal AV, Kanhai DA. Evidence base for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for diagnosis of skull fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med J. 2022 Jan;39(1):30-36. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209887. Epub 2020 Dec 3. PMID: 33273039; PMCID: PMC8717482.

  2. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al.. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study


VOTW: Intussusception

Today’s VOTW is brought to you by Dr. Fagan, Dr. Davitt and Dr. Lat!

A 2 year old male presented with abdominal pain and vomiting x1 day as well as cough and nasal congestion x2 days. On exam, he was clutching his abdomen in discomfort. A POCUS was performed which showed…

Clip 1 shows an abdominal ultrasound in the RUQ showing the classic “target sign” measureing 3.5cm, concerning for intussusception. You can visualize a smaller circular structure within a larger circular structure representing a part of bowel telescoping into the next part of the bowel. In the center, there are small circular hypoechoic lymph nodes surrounded by echogenic mesenteric fat that serves as the leading point of the intussusception.

Image 1. Target or donut sign

Ultrasound is the test of choice for intussusception and several studies have shown high sensitivity (94%) and specificity (99%) when POCUS is performed by PEM physicians (2).

POCUS for Intussusception

  • Most commonly occurs at the ileo-cecal junction and most commonly found in the right lower or right upper quadrant

  • Look for a target sign or donut sign (in transverse view, see above) or sandwich or pseudokidney sign (in longitudinal view, see below)

  • Diameter > 2cm (remember in-✌-ssusception)

    • May see mesenteric fat and lymph nodes in the center

Image 2. Pseudokidney or sandwhich sign

How to perform the study            

  • Use warm gel, have parents help distract, scan on parent's lap!

  • Use the linear probe

  • Picture frame pattern- start in the RLQ w/ probe marker to pts R scan towards the RUQ, then turn the probe w/ marker to pts head and scan towards the LUQ, then turn the probe w/ marker to pts R and scan down to the LLQ

  • Lawnmower pattern- start in the RLQ and lawnmower the entire abdomen scanning up and down from right to left with the probe marker to the pts R

  • Measure the diameter of the intussusseption if found

Image 3. Picture frame pattern

Back to the patient

Surgery was consulted, the patient underwent an air enema with resolution of the intussusseption. The patient was then discharged home.

References:

  1. Lin-Martore. PEM POCUS Series: Intussusception. https://www.aliem.com/pem-pocus-series-intussusception/

  2. Lin-Martore M, Kornblith AE, Kohn MA, Gottlieb M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Intussusception in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 2;21(4):1008-1016. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.46241. PMID: 32726276; PMCID: PMC7390574.