POTD: Spinal Cord Injuries

Here is an overview of spinal cord injury syndromes.

CENTRAL CORD SYNDROME:

Injuries to the central cord region typically affect the spinothalamic tract (pain and temperature) and the corticospinal tract (motor). 

Etiologies:

  • Typically due to hyperEXTENSION

  • Incomplete lesion

  • Develops due to poor blood flow of the spinal cord

  • Degenerative joint disease – the vignette might be about an old person with OA

Classic features:

  • Symptoms are worse in upper extremities compared to lower extremities (this is the testable feature!)

  • Sensory and motor deficits

  • Variable prognosis

ED management:

  • Intubate if the injury is higher than C5

  • If you must intubate, consider video laryngoscopy to avoid the further hyperextension of direct laryngoscopy


ANTERIOR CORD SYNDROME:

Etiologies:

  • Direct injury: HyperFLEXION injury; crush or compression from a hematoma; just think of it as the neck crushing down on the anterior column.

  • Incomplete lesion

  • Indirect injury: ischemia to anterior spinal artery

Classic features:

  • Loss of motor, pain, and temperature below the level of injury

  • Posterior column features are preserved – e.g. touch, proprioception, and vibration

  • Bad prognosis :-( 


BROWN-SEQUARD SYNDROME:

Etiology:

  • Usually penetrating trauma

  • These question stems might involve a “stab to the back”

Classic features:

  • Hemisection of spinal cord

  • Ipsilateral motor paralysis

  • Contralateral sensory loss of pain and temperature

I know you’ll never forgive me if I don’t include a quick reminder about the spinal column. If you’re struggling to keep things straight, just reminder that the posterior columns are responsible for proprioception, touch, and vibration. See below for pictures.

References:



Trauma Tuesday: Electrocution Injuries

 Epidemiology

-       3 primary age groups

o   Toddlers – household sockets, appliances, etc.

o   Adolescents – risk-taking behavior

o   Adults – occupational hazard

-       Lightning strikes – account for 50-300 deaths per year in US (mostly Florida)

-       ~6,500 injuries and 1,000 deaths annually from all electrocution injuries

 

Classification

-       Low voltage: ≤1000 volts (V)

o   Household outlets in US typically 120 V

-       High Voltage: >1000 V

o   Power lines > 7000 V

-       Alternating current (AC) = electrical source with changing direction of flow  household outlets

o   Induces rhythmic muscle contraction  tetany  prolonged electrocution as individual is locked in place

o   Although generally lower voltages, can be more dangerous than DC as the time of electrocution is much higher

-       Direct Current (DC) = electrical source with unchanging direction of current of flow  lightning strikes, cars, railroad tracks, batteries

o   Usually induces a single, forceful muscle contraction  can throw an individual with significant force  higher risk of severe blunt trauma 

 

Mechanisms of Injury

-       Induced muscle contraction  rhabdomyolysis

-       Blunt trauma

-       Burns

o   Internal thermal heating – most of damage caused by direct electrocution

o   Flash/Arc burns – electricity passes over skin causing external burns

o   Flame – electricity can ignite clothing

o   Lightning strikes can briefly raise the ambient temperature to temperatures greater than 54,000F

 

Severity of Injury – is determined by…

-       Type of current – AC vs. DC

-       Duration of contact

-       Voltage

-       Environmental circumstances (rain, etc.)

 

Clinical Manifestations

-       Cardiac – 15%, mostly benign and occur within few hours of hospital stay

o   Arrhythmias - Most occur shortly after the event, though non-life-threatening arrhythmias can occur a few hours after the event and are usually self-resolving. Generally, …

§  DC = asystole

§  AC = ventricular fibrillation

o   Other EKG findings – QT prolongation, ST elevations, bundle branch blocks, AV blocks, atrial fibrillation

-       Pulmonary

o   Respiratory paralysis – diaphragmatic muscle

o   Blunt trauma – pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusions, etc.

-       Neurologic – generally, patient can APPEAR DEAD but is the cause of neurologic electrocution and may be temporary. IE.

o   Coma

o   Fixed, dilated pupils

o   Dysautonomia

o   Paralysis or anesthesia

-       Renal – Rhabdomyolysis

-       Skin – All kinds of burns

-       MSK – from severe muscle contractions

o   Always assume C-spine injury

o   Compartment syndrome

o   Fractures/Dislocations

 

Management – we’ll divide them into categories of severity. Basically, always do an EKG!!

 

1)    Mild (<1000V) – examples include brief house outlet shock, stun gun

a.     EKG – other work-up such as troponin and CPK usually unnecessary

b.     If history/physical unremarkable (patient endorses brief contact with house outlet) patient can be discharged without further work-up

c.     If PMH puts patient at higher risk of arrhythmia (cardiac disease, sympathomimetics) can do a brief period of telemetry observation

d.    Can always observe 4-8 hours to be on the safe side

e.     High Risk Features

                                               i.     Chest pain

                                             ii.     Syncope

                                            iii.     Prolonged exposure

                                            iv.     Wet skin

2)    Severe Electrocution (>1000V) – industrial accidents, lightning strikes

a.     Coding – pursue usual ACLS

                                               i.     Keep in mind traumatic causes of arrest (tension pneumothorax, etc.)

                                             ii.     KEY FACT: remember that patients with fixed, dilated pupils, no respiratory effort, and no spontaneous movement may only have TEMPORARY neurologic stunning

                                            iii.     Pursue resuscitation longer than usual as patient with ROSC can still have good outcomes  does not appear to be any definitive guidelines on when to terminate, at physician discretion

b.     Otherwise, broad medical and traumatic work-up and likely admission for telemetry monitoring (basically just send all the labs and images)

                                               i.     Start with primary/secondary trauma survey and further imaging as required

                                             ii.     Don’t forget CPK to assess for rhabdomyolysis

c.     Consider transfer to burn center

 

TL;DR

-       Treat as you would a trauma/burn patient

-       Most household outlet shocks – history/physical, EKG, and likely quick discharge unless high risk features

-       Industrial shocks – at best admit for telemetry. At worst prolonged ACLS as good outcomes are possible. Don’t forget traumatic causes such as tension pneumothorax

 

http://brownemblog.com/blog-1/2020/4/14/acute-care-of-the-electrocuted-patient

http://www.emdocs.net/electrical-injury/

http://www.emdocs.net/em3am-electrical-injuries/

http://www.emdocs.net/em-cases-electrical-injuries-the-tip-of-the-iceberg-view-larger-image/

https://www.tamingthesru.com/blog/air-care-series/electrocution

 

 · 

Trauma Tuesday! The Cervical Collar

What is a C Collar?

 They come in a couple of different flavors, but the two extremes are hard and soft collars. The primary function of C Collars is to immobilize the C spine. Hard collars provide more immobilization and restriction of ROM compared to their soft brethren, but are generally more uncomfortable for patients.  

Why use a C Collar?

C Collars are placed to protect the spinal cord from the possibility of secondary injury in the unstable cervical spine. The theoretical risk is worsening an unstable fracture, and potentially causing devastating neurological injury.

When to use a C Collar? Who should be in a C Collar?

Following trauma, early immobilization of the cervical spine can be crucial if c-spine injury is suspected. This can be obvious in patients involved in MVA, falls, and assaults to the head or neck. On history and physical, the patient may be complaining of sensation changes, neck, and back pain. But cervical injury may not be so obvious in the patient found down and unresponsive, who cannot communicate what happened to them, and may have had signs of a recent fall and possible C spine injury.  C-collars are often placed on these patients too.

Protection of the C spine is considered so important, that a rigid C collar placement is reflexive in both the in and out of hospital environment. It's built into ATLS protocols. In many EMS protocols, if a patient is complaining of neck pain or any neurological symptom after trauma, they've bought themselves a C Collar.


This all sounds great....but then why is there debate around C-Collars?

The potential harm of C Collars:

C Collars are not benign interventions. The long term changes include muscular, bone, and tendon atrophy, but what about in the short term? Hard collars, like the C collars we place in the ED for our trauma patients, are associated with pain, breathing restriction, tissue ischemia, increase aspiration events, and adds barriers to medical care, including maintaining C spine when moving, exposing, and cleaning the patient. And that's only talking about the C collar in a vacuum: C Collars are notorious for hiding extent of trauma, such as soft tissue swelling and more commonly, bleeding of the occiput and neck. They also increase ICP- Stone et al. demonstrated that C collars increase ICP in healthy volunteers placed in C Collars, potentially worsening intracranial injury. Additional studies, like that of Kolb et al, found increased ICP measured by CSF pressure obtained through LP in a group wearing a c collar compared to a group that didn't.

What else does the literature say?

A lot of the benefits associated with C Collars are theoretical. Do they actually help and do what they're supposed to do?

Here's the problem with the existing literature: There are no prospective studies comparing an experimental C collar group with a no collar control group. And thus, a lot of research on C spine injury and c collars are done on cadavers and in analogous studies. 

Some studies looked at whether C collars are even able to immobilize the spine. One study looked at "lightly embalmed" cadavers with an induced C5-6 instability injury, and then put on different types of C collar. They tested for motion using EMG sensors, and tested all planes of cervical motion. They found no significant difference in motion between the C spine groups and the no c collar group. Another cadaver study with induced c spine instability even found increased motion in axial and cranial-caudal planes in a rigid C collar group compared to no c collar group, possibly through the creation of  "pivot points" from where the collar meets the TMJ and shoulders. 

What about the possibility of preventing secondary injury? Other studies (involving mostly cadavers, again) has shown that a considerable amount of force is required to fracture the spine, and that subsequent, low energy forces from patient's moving their neck is unlikely to cause additional spinal cord injury. Additionally, these and similar studies suggest that an unstable fracture existing without already devastating neurological injury is rare. Furthermore, it is also suggested in a retrospective study looking at neurological outcome between the USA (where we routinely immobilize with C collars) vs Malaysia (a country that does not routinely immobilize patients) and found that less neurological disability occurred in the unimmobilized group, suggesting that there may even be the potential of neurological harm. Obviously, a lot of this research is not perfect but it certainly does not favor the absolute benefit of using C collars routinely.

What should we do?

The real question at the end of the day. Placing C Collars is still the standard of care, though additional research may one day point us away from reflexively using it, and perhaps protocols detailing its use in trauma may become more sparing. In the meantime, for our trauma patients, we can decrease the time sensitive risks associated with these devices by clearing them as soon as we can, as we always have. This research at least opens my eyes to the potential of C collars causing harm, and that one day what has been drilled into my head regarding trauma management may not always be the case.

Thanks for sticking around till the end!

-SD

Sources:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481593/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2684205/

http://www.emdocs.net/cervical-collars-for-c-spine-trauma-the-facts/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751736/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/511875/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22962052/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949434/

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/evaluation-and-initial-management-of-cervical-spinal-column-injuries-in-adults?search=Cervical%20spine%20trauma&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~145&usage_type=default&display_rank=1


 ·