VOTW: "Eye-Yahh!"

This week’s VOTW is thanks to Drs. Jennie Xu and Leily Naraghi!

HPI: 56 yo male with PMH of HTN presenting for sudden near complete vision loss in his right eye since 1pm yesterday.

Review of POCUS eye anatomy



Image/Video 1: Retinal detachment - you can differentiate this from vitreous hemorrhage because retinal detachments are typically thicker and are tethered to the optic nerve posteriorly.

Image/Video 2: “Washing machine sign” is concerning for vitreous hemorrhage

There are ways to figure out if a retinal detachment is “mac-on” or “mac-off”. The macula is temporal to the optic nerve in each eye. “Mac-on” retinal detachments are true ophthalmological emergencies and need to go to the OR emergently to have the retinal reattached and save their vision. It's hard to be sure though so if you see a retinal detachment, consult ophthalmology.

Conclusion: Patient was transferred to SUNY Downstate for ophthalmological repair of partial retinal detachment.


VOTW: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Hi all,

This week’s VOTW was a case from several months ago brought to you by future ultrasound fellow Dr. Jennie Xu!

A 23 year old female w/ hx of migraines was referred to the ED by an ophthalmologist for 4 weeks of intractable headache and three days of vomiting and vision changes. The patient was told she had a "pinched nerve in her eye". She was seen in another ED 1 week ago with a normal head CT. She had no focal deficits on exam. An ocular POCUS was performed which showed…

Clip 1 shows a fan thru of a normal appearing globe. Posterior to the eye, an edematous optic nerve sheath is seen. The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured 0.65cm on the right and 0.68cm on the left. The optic disc also appears to be elevated. This is concerning for sonographic papilledema.

Given the concern for intracranial hypertension, a lumbar puncture was performed with an opening pressure > 50mmHg (the CSF actually spouted over the top of the measuring column like a water fountain ⛲).

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)

The optic nerve sheath communicates directly with the intracranial space. For the few of us that are not great at the fundoscopic exam, measuring the ONSD might be an easier alternative to evaluate for papilledema (but see test characteristics below).

How to:

  1. Use a linear probe

  2. Use a lot of gel over a closed eye lid

  3. Find the hypoechoic optic nerve and the more echogenic nerve sheath surrounding the nerve

  4. Measure the entire sheath from outer edge to outer edge at a depth of 3mm posterior to the globe (see image above)

Measurements

< 5mm is normal

5 – 6mm is a grey zone

>6mm is abnormal

Evidence

These cutoffs have a sensitivity 88-100%, specificity 63-95% for papilledema (1). The problem is many patients end up in the 'grey zone'.

*A normal ONSD does not necessarily indicate normal intracranial pressure (ICP). A dilated ONSD might also be normal for that patient, so correlate clinically!

 **ONSD unfortunately can't be used to estimate a specific ICP.

So the next time you find yourself wanting to do a fundoscopic exam, whip out your probe instead! (or use the new retinal camera in fast track...)

Back to the patient

Neurology was consulted, the patient was started on acetazolamide, and admitted to medicine. Interestingly, her CSF VZV PCR was positive so she was diagnosed with VZV meningitis. She was started on antivirals and did well overall. Her vision problems and headaches improved.

References:

  1. Shevlin, C. (2015). Optic nerve sheath ultrasound for the bedside diagnosis of intracranial hypertension: pitfalls and potential. Critical Care Horizons, 1(1), 22-30.

  2. Farkas, J. (2017). PulmCrit: Algorithm for diagnosing ICP elevation with ocular sonography. (https://emcrit.org/pulmcrit/pulmcrit-algorithm-diagnosing-icp-elevation-ocular-sonography/)

This is my last post as your ultrasound education fellow 😢. If you've read this far, I appreciate you! Thanks Dr. Danta for coming up with most of my titles ha ha ha... Dr. Ariella Cohen will take us thru the home stretch!! 🙌


VOTW: Twinkle Artifact

This week's VOTW is brought to you by Dr. Sanghvi and the UST!

An 80 year old male w/ hx of CVA, non-verbal, PEG dependence, hx urosepsis presented from a nursing home w/ hypotension and “rule out sepsis”. Given the broad differential, the UST performed multiple scans including aorta, echo, chest, FAST, renal and bladder. The left kidney showed hydronephrosis and a POCUS of the bladder was performed which showed...

Clip 1 shows a transverse view of the bladder w/ color doppler placed over the L ureterovesicular (UVJ) junction demonstrating “twinkle artifact” 🌟. This indicates the presence of a stone!

The stone can also be seen without color doppler in clip 2 as a hyperechoic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing. It is associated with upstream hydroureter which can be seen as the clip fans thru. The rectum posteriorly is also distended and filled w/ stool.

Twinkle Artifact

Twinkle artifact

While we often only find indirect signs for ureteral stones on POCUS (hydronephrosis/hydroureter), you might sometimes be able to find the culprit stone on your bladder views. They are easy to miss since the bladder wall is also echogenic, especially if the stone is small. This is where twinkle artifact can be useful!!

When color doppler is used over a rough, hyperechoic, irregular object like a stone, the ultrasound waves get reflected internally within the stone, tricking the machine into thinking that there is movement, resulting in the stone being highlighted by a rainbow doppler signal. Sometimes it will have a rainbow tail extending away from the probe.

The presence of twinkle artifact has a high positive predictive value for the presence of kidney stone (1) and is more sensitive for detection of small stones than is acoustic shadowing (2).

Back to the patient

A CTAP showed three obstructing L ureteral stones, largest being 9mm. Urology was consulted and patient underwent L ureteral stent placement with findings of “pus behind left ureteral stone”. The patient was admitted to the MICU for septic shock.

References

  1. Dillman J, Kappil M, Weadock W et al. Sonographic Twinkling Artifact for Renal Calculus Detection: Correlation with CT. Radiology. 2011;259(3):911-6. doi:10.1148/radiol.11102128 

  2. Hosn S, Rutten C, Murphy A, et al. Twinkling artifact. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org (Accessed on 20 Feb 2024) https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-21828